Information, signs, knowledge and intelligence


  • Ihor Yakoviv Institute of special communication and information protection of National technical university of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv polytechnic institute”, Kyiv,



nature of information, information environment, information impact, semantics of information, cybernetic system, controlled behavio, cybernetic system security, nature of signs, knowledge, intelligence of a cybernetic system


Understanding the special role of information in scientific knowledge formation is simultaneously accompanied by a high level of uncertainty regarding the nature of both information and knowledge. There are many approaches to information that can be constructively applied in some special areas of activity but remain completely useless in others. Against the background of such “informational diversity”, many researchers more often had the idea of the need for a universal explanation of the information phenomenon. The need to solve this problem is intuitively substantiated by the fact that the formation of information and its application create the foundation for many processes of self-organization and control in systems of various nature: chemical, biological, social, technical, and others. From the same point of view, the concept of information is often referred to as the primary one when explaining other also little understood phenomena: signs, semantics, knowledge, psyche, intelligence, mind, consciousness, self-awareness, mathematics, probability, and others. The universal concept of information and concepts derived from it can become a set of tools for formalized analysis from common conceptual positions of information processes in various scientific fields. The article presents the results of research, within the framework of which a universal information concept was obtained using a set of basic statements (axiomatic approach) and means of terminological, graphic, mathematical formalization (means of overcoming uncertainties). The information phenomenon is presented as a special result of the interaction of physical objects: the property of an object acquired during interaction contains the characteristics of another object. This approach to explaining the nature of information (attributive-transfer nature of information, ATNI), made it possible to determine the components of the process of its formation: informational impact, information carrier, essence, and semantics of information. With their help, derived concepts are defined: information environment and its characteristics; cybernetic system, the formalized model of its controlled behavior and security criteria; signs and their relationship with information; knowledge and intelligence of the cybernetic system. The applicability of the proposed approach to the analysis of processes in information environments of various natures: protein, neural, computer, has been tested.

Author Biography

Ihor Yakoviv, Institute of special communication and information protection of National technical university of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv polytechnic institute”, Kyiv,

candidate of technical sciences,
associate professor, associate
professor at the cybersecurity
and application of information
systems and technology
academic department


R. V. L. Hartley, “Transmission of information”, Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 7, iss. 3, pp. 535-563, 1928, doi:

C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication”, Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, iss. 3, pp. 379-423, 1948, doi:

C. E. Shannon, and W. Weaver, “The Mathematical Theory of Communication”, University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 1949.

A. N. Kolmogorov, “Three Approaches to the Quantitative Definition of Information”, International Journal of Computer Mathematics, vol. 2, iss. 1-4, pp. 157-168, 1968, doi:

V. P. Sedyakin, “Information and knowledge”, Scientific statements, № 8 (63), pp. 180-187, 2009.

Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua and Rudolf Carnap, “Semantic Information”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 4, iss. 14, pp. 147-157, 1953, doi:

R. Vigo, “Representational information: A new general notion and measure of information”, Information Sciences, vol. 181, iss. 21, pp. 4847-4859, 2011, doi:

R. Vigo, “Complexity over Uncertainty in Generalized Representational Information Theory (GRIT): A Structure-Sensitive General Theory of Information”, Information, no. 4, pp. 1-30, 2013, doi:

K. Buckland, and K. Michael, “Information as thing”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, no. 42 (5), pp. 351-360, 1991.

P. Beynon-Davies, Business Information Systems. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

A. L. Yalovets, Representation and processing of knowledge from the point of view of mathematical modeling. Problems and solutions. Kyiv: Vidavnystvo “Naukova Dumka”, 2011.

L. Floridi, “What is the Philosophy of Information?”, Metaphilosophy, vol. 33, iss. 1-2. pp. 123-145, 2002.

L. Floridi, “Open problems in the philosophy of information”, Metaphilosophy, vol. 35, iss. 4. pp. 554-582, 2004.

I. Yakoviv, “Communication channel from the standpoint of the attributive-transfer essence of information”, Information Technologies and Security, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 84-96, 2012, doi:

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2015, May 25). NIST Special Publication 800-82. Revision 1, Guide to Industrial Control Systems Security. [Online], Available: Accessed on: Aug. 10, 2020.

R. Carter, How the Brain Works. Moscow: АСТ Corpus, 2014.

Ch. S. Pierce, “What is a sign?”, Translation into Russian. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, no. 3 (7), pp. 88-95, 2009.

C. W. Morris, Writings on the General Theory of Signs. Den Haag: Mouton, 1971.

R. Menzel, and J. Fischer, Animal Thinking: Contemporary Issues in Comparative Cognition, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2011, doi:

E. A. Wasserman, and T. R. Zentall, Comparative cognition: Experimental explorations of animal intelligence. USA: Oxford University Press. 2006.

J. Foster, J. Smolka J, D. Nilsson, and M. Dacke, “How animals follow the stars”, in Proc. Biological Sciences, vol. 285, iss. 1871, 20172322, doi:

S. Coren, The Intelligence of Dogs. New York: Simon & Schuster,1995.

A. Trewavas, “Green plants as intelligent organisms”, Trends in Plant Science, vol. 10, iss. 9, pp. 413-419, 2005, doi:

A. Trewavas, “Mindless mastery”, Nature, vol. 415, iss, 6874, pp. 841, 2002, doi:

R. Goebel, D. Poole, and A. Mackworth, Computational intelligence: A logical approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1997.

R. Stuart, and P. Norvig, Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. London: Pearson, 2009.

A. Kaplan, and M. Haelein, “Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence”, Businss Horizons, vol. 62, iss. 1, pp. 15-25, 2019, doi:

I. Yakoviv, “Information and telecommunication system, conceptual model of cyberspace and cybersecurity”, Information Technology and Security, vol. 5, iss. 2 (9), pp. 134-142, 2017, doi:

I. Yakoviv, “Basic model of information processes and behavior of cyber defense system”, Information Technology and Security, vol. 7, iss. 2 (13), pp. 183-196, 2019, doi:

I. Yakoviv, “Cybernetic model of the advanced persistent threat”, Information Technology and Security, vol. 6, iss. 2, pp. 46-58, 2018, doi:

I. Yakoviv, and V. Tsyganok, “A Procedure for Assessing the State of Cybersecurity of Power Grids”, in Proc. International Scientific and Practical Conference Information Technologies and Security (ITS 2018). Kyiv, 2018. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Aug. 19, 2020.




How to Cite

Yakoviv, I. (2020). Information, signs, knowledge and intelligence. Information Technology and Security, 8(2), 191–215.